Folder renaming question
Answered
I renamed the files in a directory which had RAW files and versions of several images. I had hoped that the renamer function would preserve the version number ( I used foldername_sequence as my tokens). I had hoped that Kurz001.RW2 and Kurz001v1.RW2 in Folder 2022_France would change to 2022_France001.RW2 and 2022France001v1.RW2 but instead got 2022_France001.RW2 and 2022_France002.RW2. Any way that I can get this to work? I know it will work if I rename before I work on the files, but I often forget. Am I missing something- Is there a token for version no?
Steve
-
No, there is no token for Version and it appears the Rename function does not take them into account and just. treats them like any other file. This is something you'll have to ask support about to see if it is a bug or by design.
0 -
Took your suggestion and placed a support request . Below is the reply
Your request (333859) has been updated.
To add additional comments, reply to this email.
Ryan (ON1)
Dec 30, 2022, 10:12 PST
Hello Steven,
Thanks for using ON1! I apologize for the frustration. The version naming issue you've run into is a bug which we're looking into and hope to have resolved soon. We don't have an exact time frame for the fix just yet, but we've received several similar reports.
We appreciate your patience and understanding!
- Ryan | QA Engineer
Steven Kurzrok
Dec 29, 2022, 18:36 PST
I renamed the files in a directory which had RAW files and versions of several images. I had hoped that the renamer function would preserve the version number ( I used foldername_sequence as my tokens). I had hoped that Kurz001.RW2 and Kurz001v1.RW2 in Folder 2022_France would change to 2022_France001.RW2 and 2022France001v1.RW2 but instead got 2022_France001.RW2 and 2022_France002.RW2. Any way that I can get this to work? I know it will work if I rename before I work on the files, but I often forget. Am I missing something- Is there a token for version no?
Steve
No, there is no token for Version and it appears the Rename function does not take them into account and just. treats them like any other file. This is something you'll have to ask support about to see if it is a bug or by design.
Is this a bug or was it designed to work this way? If so, it would be very useful for renaming to take into account version numbers
0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
2 comments