Caroline Picking
- Total activity 86
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 10
- Subscriptions 24
Comments
Votes on activity by Caroline Picking-
Yeah, I use ON1 to the max, so it very often involves layers. And masks - lots of masks. And local adjustments. :) That's why I was thinking that 12gb could be more "valuable" than an extra 15% spe...
-
Ahhh Sam, there's a question! My Mac has a 13in screen and my PC a 27in screen, so if I'm home it's naturally the desktop although I *can* quickly hook my Mac up to said screen - and I did at times...
-
Sam, I had a system very similar to yours (slightly later i5, same graphics card). Raw 2022 ran, as you say, like a one-legged turtle. First off, that did improve steadily over the year as ON1 work...
-
Also have a 2060 with the same problem. Mine is an ordinary 2060, not any kind if 'Super' or Ti
-
Ok, scratch that. The softening is a 'thing' but it's only the preview version of the RAF that has the artefacts. When I opened it back up for editing, the 'blocks' aren't there. Still, never seen ...
-
I decide today to look at another photo taken with the XT-5 and, if anything it's even weirder. I'm beginning to wonder if there's nothing wrong with the RAF per se, but something about the version...
-
Yes, that would be great. I'll do that now - but then I'm afraid I'll disappear, because it's nearly 1am and I have work in the morning! Thank you :)
-
Ok, this gets weirder by the minute. Another screenshot, this time zoomed into 200% - because I spotted something on the sheep's head. The RAF file is on the *left* and the JPG on the right. The JP...
-
Genius move of mine! The right one is the edited RAW file pre-export. The left one is the exported file. TIFF or JPG, can't recall which - which doesn't matter, as they were identical (along with t...
-
Here's the screenshot for the above post. It's really obvious on my screen - but I'm not sure it shows up on an embedded picture. Is there a better way to do this?